Revised 19/Feb/2018
THE CIRCUMCISION
DIVIDE
Iceland has proposed a ban on circumcision of boys in 2018, which resulted in protests from Muslims and Jews. They banned the circumcision of girls in 2005 but had no laws banning circumcision of boys, according to an article in The Independent.
Circumcision protesters are on the move across the U.S. They showed up in Springfield MO on 7 April 2016—not surprisingly, their graphic fake blood on clothes grabbed attention and made the local news (KSPR).
Circumcision protesters are on the move across the U.S. They showed up in Springfield MO on 7 April 2016—not surprisingly, their graphic fake blood on clothes grabbed attention and made the local news (KSPR).
Protests about circumcision have usually been about the
horror of cutting young girls. And that’s something considered a problem in
other countries— not the western democracies like the U.S.
This U.S. protest was about male circumcision. The
placard carriers are against cruelty to boys—torture is their word. They view
the procedure as optional and thus one that should be left to the individuals
to decide when they are older.
The reframing of the issue from as a moral concern rather
than a medical procedure deserves some attention. One moral foundation I
discuss in my recent book, A House Divided, is the harm-care
dimension. There is no doubt the cutting hurts. Is there any justification in
the form of benefits due to circumcision?
The Mayo Clinic cites reasons for circumcision and notes
it is part of Jewish and Islamic religious practice.
Here’s the Mayo
Clinic opinion:
The American Academy of
Pediatrics (AAP) says the benefits of circumcision outweigh the risks. However,
the AAP doesn't recommend routine circumcision for all male newborns. The AAP
leaves the circumcision decision up to parents — and supports use of
anesthetics for infants who have the procedure.
So what about the morality issue?
Christians were divided over circumcision early on.
Essentially, Christian converts were not required to follow this Jewish
practice despite the biblical basis for the procedure. Instead, circumcision
became metaphorical—a matter of the heart (See Acts 15; 1 Corinthians 7).
Secular medical practice provides reasons why
circumcision is worth the pain and notes the pain can be reduced with an
anesthetic.
A libertarian argument favors letting the individual
choose.
We live in a time when old traditions are being
challenged. But many people, if not most, are sensitive to practices that
produce harm—especially when alternatives are available.
Read more about Sex-related morality, including
circumcision, in chapter 6 of A House Divided
Free exam copies to professors
Contact Information
Facebook Page: Geoff W. Sutton
Twitter @GeoffWSutton
My Website: Geoff W. Sutton www.suttong.com
Comments
Post a Comment