The rise of women to diverse positions of power in many world cultures marks a change in the historical record of male domination. Yet, in politics, religion, and family life, the predominant role for women is less than equal.
Pictures of Muslim women wearing the Burka, Niqab, or Hijab
remind us of the powerful role of religious traditions in prescribing what
women wear.
In preparing a presentation about biblical gender roles, I
was reminded again of the consistent pattern of male leadership in the Bible—including
those specific verses telling women to submit to their husbands.
In this post, I want to look at some ways women have emerged
from the stifling grip of male-dominated Christian traditions. I will leave it
to others to examine what is happening in other religious cultures.
Men Rule by God!
In the opening biblical stories, it is not long before Eve
finds her place in a narrative that keeps women in submission for thousands of
years. Paul, the traditional author of 1
Timothy 2, takes his readers back to the first few chapters of the Bible to
explain the importance of “full submission” for women.
Of course, one text doesn’t make a doctrine. But the pattern
of female submission, based on the order of creation, the teaching that the
first woman led a man into sin, and the God ordained male leadership role
(Genesis 3:16) remains the norm for male-female relationships in much of
Christendom.
“Wives, submit yourselves…” (Ephesians 5:22 NIV). In this New
Testament document, Paul explains the biblical hierarchy for family life as
part of his teaching about the church. The message of wives submitting to men
is repeated in Colossians 3 and 1 Timothy 2 as well as 1 Peter 3. The words are
pretty similar so, it is easy to see why Christian women have lived in
submission to men for thousands of years.
People used to joke about marriage being a “ball and chain”
for men. In truth, women were the ones in bondage. Their only biblical methods
for escape from a bad marriage were the death of a husband or divorce based on the
husband’s adultery (e.g., Matthew 19; 1 Corinthians 7). In reality, men
controlled political and religious power and thus determined who could divorce
whom. And because women could not be in authority over men and were relegated
to salvific childcare by God (1 Timothy 2:15), there was not much of a chance
for women to live independently of a man.
Women as Helpful Property
We should not forget that women were created to be helpers for
men (Genesis 2). In the “rapist rule,” women had no obvious control over their
life. In Deuteronomy 22, a rapist must pay the girl’s father and marry his raped girl-victim for life. It’s common knowledge in Christian cultures that only men could have
multiple wives and concubines. The biblical accounts make it clear that having
a lot of beautiful women was evidence of God’s blessing.
Revising Men’s Bibles
So many things have happened in the past century in terms of
male-female relationships that it is impossible to point to any one event as
the primary reason for women approaching equality with men.
The links in the chain of submission include education,
employment, and birth control. Ironically, two World Wars enhanced the role of
women in those nations most involved in the wars. It’s only been about 100
years that women have gained the right to vote.
Following the revision of societal traditions of male dominance,
women and men have begun to tackle the Christian submission narrative. Liberal
divorce laws enabled women to separate from abusive men. In the last few
decades, divorce among Christians has risen as it has in secular cultures.
Divorced and remarried Christians are welcomed in most churches. The biblical
text hasn’t changed but the narrative of condemnation has been silenced.
A number of churches hire women as clergy and support women
in higher leadership positions. Religious people depend on text-linked
arguments to justify changes. Women and men have promoted the few biblical examples of
women in various leadership roles in ancient Israel (e.g., Miriam, Deborah) as
well as during the early church (Mary, Tabitha). And they point to some
examples of how Jesus interacted in kind and respectful ways toward women.
Revisionists highlight bits of text to show that there is no
difference in God’s kingdom between men and women (Galatians 3:28). They remind congregants of mutual submission (Ephesians 5:21). And argue that many biblical teachings
were specific to a godly life within an ancient culture or even a subculture.
A quick look at challenges to the restrictions in 1 Timothy 2 can be found at the Junia Project post by Gail Wallace. She makes five points worthy of consideration: 1. The translation of the word authority, 2. Failure to apply literal interpretations to other texts, 3. Ignoring the personal letter context, 4. Elevating these verses above other verses, 5. Logical problems in putting the text into practice.
A quick look at challenges to the restrictions in 1 Timothy 2 can be found at the Junia Project post by Gail Wallace. She makes five points worthy of consideration: 1. The translation of the word authority, 2. Failure to apply literal interpretations to other texts, 3. Ignoring the personal letter context, 4. Elevating these verses above other verses, 5. Logical problems in putting the text into practice.
Some like Karen
King take an even stronger approach as she challenges men’s views of the
Biblical texts. Not only does she point to leadership roles for women and
challenge the negative narrative about Mary Magdalene, but she also refers to
other texts (e.g., Gospel of Mary) left out of the Bible.
Will Christian Women
Ever Attain Full Equality?
It is hard to imagine a world in which the Pope and
Patriarchs of Christian Orthodox churches will be women. But it is not hard to
see that women will continue to increase in shared decision-making power with
men in many Christian groups, including the Catholic Church.
I suspect there will always be groups of Christians who will
remain bound by traditional understandings of the biblical texts. Even in these conservative groups,
the recent revisions in narratives have emphasized the importance of love and
respect such that men are taught that leadership in homes requires them to love
their wives as Christ loved the church.
Men have found crafty ways to maintain control or perhaps a
semblance of biblical leadership. For example, women may be the pastors of churches
or the CEOs of Christian organizations and Christian colleges but the denominational
leader or head of the board is still a chairMAN.
When pressed about love, some men are quick to point out that love is sometimes tough and that, as in medical care, sometimes pain is justified to save a life.
Notes
An interesting documentary, The Ascent of Woman, looked at the
history of women and provided many examples of women left out of dominant
narratives of history.
In A House Divided, I cover submission in the context of marriage in Chapter 8. In Chapter 10 I discuss biblical views of women and men.
See the Gender Inequality Index for a general view of women and men in the world.
After writing this post, I noticed that George Paul Wood posted a Podcast of an interview with Waldemar Kowalski questioning limitations to women's leadership in churches based on 1 Timothy 2:8-15.
The conservative publication, Christianity Today, often includes stories of women in ministry.
Comments
Post a Comment