Taking Miracles Seriously- or Not

 

Our Lady of Lourdes- A free to use Bing Image


A Scientific Approach to Healing



When it comes to belief in miracles, Christians are A House Divided. 

When 60 minutes did a story on a famous place of miracles, Our Lady of Lourdes, I wasn’t so interested until Bill Whitaker presented their medical team approach.

In my view, certain Christian groups have overpromised and underdelivered when it comes to faith healing. The widespread antiscience attitude has been a barrier to many in the sciences—especially those of us whose work impacts human beings. For the most part, faith healing extremists have been side-lined but we read about unscientific and religious approaches to the pandemic promoted as alternatives to what mainstream medical scientists presented. That’s the context for my scepticism.

A different but related concern is the word-games people play. If you define miracle broadly enough, you can call any pleasing event a miracle. Forget about the work of physicians, nurses, pharmacologists, and the range of specialties on medical teams involved in the treatment of complex illnesses. If a treated patient gets well following prayer, “it’s a miracle.” Such rejoicing does nothing for the credibility of faith when people have been treated with evidenced-based methods nor do miracle claims reflect expressions of gratitude owed to those hard working medical team members who assiduously applied their skills linked to recovery.

Enter Our Lady of Lourdes. As I mentioned, I wasn’t so interested until the program revealed the role of physicians in vetting miracle claims. If you watch the piece you will learn that only 70 medical miracles have been recognized by the church in 160 years. So many people head to Lourdes. Many are not cured but 7,000 said they were.

According to those interviewed, a medical team reviews the evidence presented by a person who claims to be cured. Examinations are ordered and specialists are involved as needed. One claimant, Sister Bernadette Moriau was sent to two psychiatrists in Paris. “They wanted to know if I was lying.” She said. It appears some 300 physicians were involved in her case.

What’s pleasing to me is the limited statement of determination by the medical professionals. Her case was “medically unexplained.” We shouldn't ask scientists to go beyond the boundaries of science. The church determined Sister Bernadette’s recovery was a miracle—number 70.

Well, the 60 minutes news piece closes with a truism:

“It's been said about Lourdes:

for those who believe, no explanation is necessary.

For those who do not, no explanation is possible.”

As a psychologist, I couldn’t  help feeling compassion for all those thousands who go so far and return home as they were. And I marvel at the low odds of being dubbed “medically unexplained.”

Reference

CBS News 60 minutes Sanctuary of Our Lady of Lourdes

18 December 2022

Link https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sanctuary-of-our-lady-of-lourdes-miracles-cures-2022-12-18/

 

I write about psychology and religion.

 

Please check out my website   www.suttong.com

   and see my books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Also, consider connecting with me on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    

You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

 

Comments